Corruption With and Without Theft
Contributed Content (0) and Suggested Materials (2)
Ask a Question
Doesn't the argument that penalizing corruption may lead to a reduction in licenses applied for assume that there is no way of getting a license without paying a bribe?
I agree, that last part was a pretty poor argument. It assumed on the one hand that you are reducing competition by locking up Corrupt officials but then also assumes there is no competitive pressure from non-corrupt officials working in the same market of issuing licenses. - You could just as easily argue that nigher penalization would increase the numbers of non-corrupt license issuers and hence by market mechanisms reduce bribe costs. As licensees would just go see a non-corrupt licenser.
In that case, it may be that the "honest" officials take it very easy when granting a license. So maybe it takes them 4 months to produce all the paperwork, whereas going to the more "corrupt" official might speed up the process by costing more in terms of cash.
Facts And Figures Every Consumer Should Know About Claire Casey's Guide To Fast And Easy Attraction With Men